ZIN2 System
ZIN2 System: Beyond Conventional Compound Analysis, Toward Creative Design
1. Limitations of Conventional Compound Analysis
Commonly used compound analysis tools typically provide the following results:
- ADME indices (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion)
- Physicochemical properties (e.g., logP, solubility)
- Basic toxicity predictions
While useful as a starting point, their scope and depth remain limited:
– Unable to model structural modifications or novel derivatives
– No simulation of efficacy changes over time
– No evaluation against global regulatory standards
2. Scope of the ZIN2 System
The ZIN2-TrustProof™ and integrated modules go far beyond prediction. They provide a new dimension of analysis and design.
- Structure-based analysis → Deconstructs key functional motifs and enables new derivative design
- Efficacy flow simulation → Predicts multiple functions such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-wrinkle along biological time rhythms
- Safety & regulatory pre-validation → Simulates compliance with FDA, EMA, KFDA standards before development
- Market applicability → Expands results toward real product/industry applications
3. Comparative Summary
Category | Conventional Analysis | ZIN2 System Analysis |
---|---|---|
Focus | Physicochemical values | Structure, efficacy, future design |
Output | ADME, limited toxicity data | Novel derivatives, multi-efficacy simulation |
Regulatory Linkage | None | Global compliance pre-validation |
Industry Utility | Reference level | Product and market readiness |
4. Conclusion
Compound analysis alone, limited to numeric predictions, is no longer sufficient.
The ZIN2 System expands analysis into creative design.
- Conventional tools: “Interpret the present”
- ZIN2 System: “Design the future”
This difference will directly determine future competitiveness in research and industry.
👉 In the next post, we will demonstrate a real compound case study, comparing Conventional analysis results vs ZIN2 System results.
Comments